Skip to main content

A construction
partner for developers.

Developers do not buy 'construction' the same way an owner-occupant does — they buy schedule certainty, GMP discipline, and a builder who can read a pro forma. We run developer engagements as either CM-at-risk (open-book with a guaranteed maximum price) or design-build, depending on the deal structure and the financing source. The construction is the same conventional Type V or podium work; the contract and reporting layer is different.

CA Lic. #1145233

Developers are buying weekly draws against a stabilization deadline. The construction has to serve that deadline.

What we mean by developer construction partner.

  • DV-01 · CM-at-risk small multifamily (5–30 units)

    Size
    Site-dependent
    All-in
    $400 – $750 / sqft
    Schedule
    20 – 32 months build

    Open-book GMP delivery with owner-controlled buyout, named subcontractors, and pre-construction budgeting locked at CDs.

  • DV-02 · Design-build infill

    Size
    Site-dependent
    All-in
    $420 – $750 / sqft
    Schedule
    24 – 36 months total

    Single-contract delivery for developers who prefer one accountable party. Architect, structural, MEP, Title 24, build under one fee.

  • DV-03 · Density-bonus / SB 423 multifamily

    Size
    Per program
    All-in
    $400 – $700 / sqft
    Schedule
    24 – 36 months build

    Preconstruction includes objective-standards review and ministerial-path verification so the entitlement clock is realistic.

  • DV-04 · Tear-down + rebuild for repositioning

    Size
    Per program
    All-in
    $500 – $1,000 / sqft + demo
    Schedule
    20 – 30 months total

    Replace a 1950s SFR or aging duplex with a fourplex / townhome row / small multifamily.

Real California cost ranges.

Developer projects sit inside the same per-square-foot cost bands as owner work, but the contract structure (CM-at-risk vs design-build), the financing source (bank / CDFI / LIHTC / private), and the prevailing-wage status drive variance. Soft costs are typically 14–22% of hard-cost subtotal depending on entitlement complexity.

  • Contract structure

    CM-at-risk with GMP: owner controls buyout, sees every subcontract; small premium over fixed-price. Design-build: single-source accountability; bundled fee.

  • Off-site + civil

    Sidewalk, ramps, utility trench, storm-water, transformer — $150k–$1M depending on parcel and city. Critical to scope at feasibility.

  • Prevailing wage

    When applicable (public funding, local ordinance, certain unit-count thresholds), prevailing wage adds 15–30% to labor cost. Confirm at feasibility.

  • Fire / life safety

    NFPA 13R sprinklers, alarm per NFPA 72, emergency egress lighting. $4–$8/sqft of building.

  • Title 24 + CALGreen

    Heat pumps, PV per CEC 2022, battery readiness, EVCS. $35–$80/sqft above 2019-code.

  • Soft costs + financing

    14–22% of hard cost. Construction loan interest reserve, lender inspections, owner's rep, legal.

The permit path.

Developer projects follow the same permit path as owner projects — building permit, MEP, fire, Title 24, CALGreen, civil, off-site improvements. The reporting layer is different: we run weekly schedule reports, monthly budget reconciliation, draw-package preparation for the construction lender, and a published change-order protocol against the GMP.

  • Building permit (architectural + structural)
  • MEP permits
  • Fire sprinkler + alarm permits
  • Title 24 energy compliance
  • CALGreen worksheet
  • Accessibility plan review
  • EVCS provisioning
  • Civil engineering + off-site improvements
  • Density bonus / SB 423 determination (when applicable)
  • Lender-required reports + draw inspections

How California code shapes the work.

California developer projects are governed by CBC, Title 24, CALGreen, Subdivision Map Act (when applicable), Density Bonus Law, SB 423, locally-adopted amendments, and any project-specific public funding or affordability covenants. Prevailing wage and Davis-Bacon (federal funds) apply project-specifically.

What the schedule actually looks like.

  1. Step 01

    Preconstruction + GMP estimate

    Open-book budgeting against developer pro forma. Trade scopes drafted.

    8 – 16 weeks
  2. Step 02

    Buyout + subcontract award

    Owner-witnessed bid review per scope. GMP locks.

    6 – 12 weeks
  3. Step 03

    Mobilization + sitework

    Grading, civil, utilities, transformer.

    6 – 14 weeks
  4. Step 04

    Foundation + structure

    Podium pour (if applicable), then Type V framing.

    14 – 32 weeks
  5. Step 05

    MEP + finishes

    Per-unit MEP, fire / alarm, finishes, common areas.

    28 – 50 weeks
  6. Step 06

    Punch + stabilization handoff

    Per-unit final inspections, leasing coordination, lender certificate.

    8 – 16 weeks

How we run this work.

Developer engagements start with a preconstruction agreement — paid scope, fixed deliverables (constructibility review, value-engineering log, schedule risk register, GMP estimate at 100% CDs). The preconstruction work is independent of the GC contract; if the deal does not pencil at GMP, the project does not proceed and we close out preconstruction.

GMP locks at construction documents with owner-witnessed buyout. Every subcontract is open-book; the owner sees the bid log, the award rationale, and the contingency assumptions. Change orders against the GMP are priced against the locked subcontracts.

Construction reporting is weekly: schedule update, two-week look-ahead, RFI log, change-order log, draw-package status. Monthly: budget reconciliation against GMP, contingency burn report, lender inspection coordination. Owners and lenders never have to ask for a status; it comes to them.

Frequently asked.

What is the difference between CM-at-risk and design-build for developers?
CM-at-risk: owner hires architect separately, hires CM with a guaranteed maximum price contract, CM does open-book buyout of subcontractors with owner participation. Design-build: single contract for architecture + engineering + construction; less owner participation, more single-source accountability. Most California developer projects with construction loans run CM-at-risk.
What is a GMP and how is it locked?
Guaranteed Maximum Price — the CM agrees that total project cost will not exceed an agreed maximum, with savings shared between owner and CM per contract. GMP typically locks at construction documents (95%+ complete) with named subcontractors. Owner-side change orders increase the GMP; CM-side cost overruns absorb into the CM's fee.
Will you work with our outside architect?
Yes — CM-at-risk delivery is structured around an outside architect. We participate in design coordination during DD and CDs but do not own the design contract.
How do you handle prevailing wage?
On prevailing-wage projects we use prevailing-wage signatory subcontractors and report payroll certifications per California Labor Code and federal Davis-Bacon (when applicable). Prevailing wage is identified at feasibility so the labor cost is in the GMP from day one.
What reporting do you provide for the construction lender?
Weekly schedule reports, monthly draw packages aligned to lender format, monthly budget reconciliation, contingency burn report, RFI / change-order logs, and accompanying lender's inspector on monthly walks. Most California construction lenders accept our draw-package format without modification.
What is your fee structure?
CM-at-risk: pre-construction fee (paid scope) + CM fee on construction (typically 3–6% of hard cost) + general conditions (cost-reimbursable per published schedule). Design-build: bundled fee at 14–22% of hard cost depending on depth. Both structures are documented before contract execution.
Have you completed projects under LIHTC or affordable financing?
Affordability projects (LIHTC, MHP, AHSC, local affordable funds) require prevailing wage, specific reporting, and compliance with the financing program's construction standards. We have the systems for this work; we confirm program-specific requirements at feasibility.

Start with a feasibility memo.

Tell us about the parcel and the program. We'll come back with a written feasibility memo before any design work starts.

request a quote

Tell us what you’re building.

A few specifics — city, scope, budget, target date. We’ll come back with a one-page feasibility note within the week.

Phone or email — at least one so we can reply.

We use this to route your lead to the right studio. No spam, ever.

Trade cardLeo's on site · replies in ~3h

Want a real number for your Developer Construction Partner job?

  • We open the books on similar jobs from the last 24 months
  • Hand-built estimate, not a software auto-quote
  • Includes permits, finishes, and the boring stuff

3-day turnaround · Free

Compare scopes

Contact form · 30 seconds

or call (818) 650-3197

No spam. We reply personally — usually within 3 hours.

Call